Centrelink Loophole to Avoid New CGT Rule: Could Help Aussies Avoid New 30% Capital Gains Tax Rule

Australians receiving certain Centrelink payments could escape a proposed 30 per cent minimum capital gains tax (CGT) rate, creating an unexpected opportunity for some retirees and investors. However, financial experts warn that qualifying for the exemption may be far more difficult than it first appears, particularly for people holding valuable shares or investment properties.

The proposed changes have sparked questions about whether receiving the Age Pension or another eligible government payment could reduce the tax payable when selling investments.

What Is Changing?

The federal government’s proposed CGT reform would introduce a 30 per cent minimum tax rate on certain capital gains, changing how some investors calculate their tax obligations.

Under the proposed approach, gains accumulated before the transition date would continue to be treated under existing arrangements. Later gains would receive an inflation adjustment before the relevant tax rules were applied.

The aim is to reduce the advantage investors can gain by waiting until their taxable income falls before selling an asset.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has argued that the proposed minimum rate would bring the taxation of investment profits closer to the rates paid by many working Australians.

However, the proposal includes an important exception for people receiving specified government income support payments.

Centrelink Exemption

One of the most closely watched features of the proposal is the treatment of Centrelink recipients.

According to financial planner and economist Nick Bruining, people receiving an eligible Centrelink income support payment would not be subject to the proposed 30 per cent minimum CGT rate.

Payments identified as eligible include:

  • Age Pension
  • JobSeeker Payment
  • Disability Support Pension
  • Carer Payment

The Carer Allowance, which is different from the Carer Payment, would not qualify under the exemption described.

The distinction matters because Australians receiving an eligible payment could have their capital gains assessed under their ordinary marginal income tax rates instead of the proposed minimum rate.

That does not mean the profits would automatically become tax-free.

Tax Still Applies

Bruining has cautioned investors against assuming that Centrelink eligibility eliminates their capital gains tax obligations.

The exemption would remove the proposed minimum rate, not the underlying requirement to pay tax on assessable capital gains.

An eligible recipient could still owe tax depending on their total taxable income, the size of the gain and the applicable CGT calculation.

For example, a retiree selling shares at a substantial profit might face additional income tax even while receiving a part Age Pension.

The final liability would depend on the legislation in force, the timing of the sale and the individual’s circumstances.

This makes it important to distinguish between avoiding a minimum tax threshold and avoiding capital gains tax altogether.

Pension Strategy

The proposed exemption has prompted speculation that some older Australians might attempt to qualify for the Age Pension before selling investments.

In theory, receiving even a part pension could make the exemption relevant.

However, Age Pension eligibility depends on both income and assets tests, and applicants must satisfy other requirements, including age and residency conditions.

Investors cannot simply choose to receive a pension because doing so would produce a more favourable tax outcome.

A large investment portfolio may prevent someone from qualifying, regardless of whether they have retired or receive little employment income.

Income Limits

The figures cited in discussion of the proposal put the fortnightly income limits for a part Age Pension at $2,627.80 for singles and $4,016.80 combined for couples.

The quoted asset limits were:

Pension applicantQuoted asset limit
Single homeowner$745,750
Couple homeowners$1,121,000
Single non-homeowner$1,012,750
Couple non-homeowners$1,388,000

These are figures from the supplied reporting, not verified current Centrelink thresholds. Pension limits are periodically adjusted and must be checked before making financial decisions.

The family home is generally excluded from the Age Pension assets test, although other investments and financial holdings are assessed.

Hidden Risks

University of Tasmania taxation specialist Donovan Castelyn has warned that using Centrelink eligibility to avoid the proposed tax floor would be extremely difficult for many investors.

A major obstacle is that the investment someone intends to sell may itself prevent them from qualifying for the pension.

Selling an asset also does not necessarily solve the problem. Proceeds retained in a bank account or reinvested elsewhere may remain assessable under Centrelink rules.

Changes to investment income, financial assets and pension entitlements can also affect the overall financial outcome.

Consequently, a strategy that appears to reduce tax could create complications involving pension eligibility and future payments.

Gifting Rules

Some retirees may consider transferring assets to family members to reduce their assessable wealth.

However, Centrelink has deprivation rules designed to prevent people from qualifying for higher payments simply by giving away substantial assets.

Assets gifted above permitted limits may continue to count under the means tests for five years.

This means transferring investments to children shortly before applying for the Age Pension may not deliver the intended result.

Such transfers can also create separate tax consequences, including CGT implications.

What Comes Next?

Australians considering selling shares, property or other investments should avoid making decisions based solely on the possibility of a Centrelink exemption.

The proposed rules, commencement arrangements and eligibility details need to be confirmed against enacted legislation before investors rely on them.

Current pension thresholds should also be checked directly with Services Australia.

For some eligible income support recipients, the proposed exemption could provide meaningful tax relief. For others, the pension means tests and existing anti-avoidance safeguards may make the strategy impractical.

The key takeaway is that Centrelink eligibility could remove the proposed 30 per cent minimum tax rate, but it would not guarantee a tax-free investment sale.

Author

  • Robin
     

Leave a Comment